2 results
four - Government legislation and the restriction of personal freedoms
- Edited by Fiona Spotswood, University of the West of England
-
- Book:
- Beyond Behaviour Change
- Published by:
- Bristol University Press
- Published online:
- 01 September 2022
- Print publication:
- 26 February 2016, pp 71-88
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Introduction
The health of the people is the highest law. (Cicero, De Legibus, circa 40bc)
As Jane Austen might have observed, it is a truth universally acknowledged that a government in pursuit of its role will seek to influence the behaviour of its populace. She might have added that this includes behaviours affecting the safety, health and wellbeing of individuals, communities, workforces and society at large. Governments exercise their influence in a variety of ways: through regulation by passing laws; persuasion using social marketing campaigns; incentivisation using fiduciary instruments and other financial inducements; education providing knowledge and skills; the provision of services; ecological changes to the physical, social and economic environments; and many others. Some of these levers are applied at national or international level, others at regional and local level. Many are discussed – and often criticised and questioned – during the various chapters of this book.
This chapter explores some of the ways in which governments use legislation to directly regulate individual behaviour in order to safeguard and promote the health of the people. We consider how the public responds to this approach, and we weigh up some of its benefits and pitfalls.
An historical perspective
Public health and regulation targeted at individuals are familiar bedfellows. They share a long history. Enforced restrictions on personal freedoms have historically been seen as a relatively quick and simple way to ensure changes in behaviour to protect the health and wellbeing of individuals and communities. The earliest examples were almost entirely concerned with health protection, personal and community safety, avoidance of environmental hazards and the prevention and control of communicable disease. In ancient times, religious rites about hand and foot washing and disposal of the dead through burial, embalming or funeral pyre had spin-off benefits for hygiene and health. In ancient Babylon, religious rules forbade the digging of wells near burial grounds and midden heaps. Throughout the Middle East and Europe, lepers were forcibly confined to closed colonies from the earliest times. During the Black Death that swept Europe in the 14th century, bubonic plague sufferers were compelled to stay in their homes, as indeed they were even more forcibly during the Great Plague that ravaged Europe two centuries later.
Weight management in primary care: how can it be made more effective?
- Alan Maryon-Davis
-
- Journal:
- Proceedings of the Nutrition Society / Volume 64 / Issue 1 / February 2005
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 07 March 2007, pp. 97-103
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Obesity is often difficult to tackle in primary care. Pressure of time in the consultation, a lack of appropriately-trained primary care staff, a shortage of community dietitians or nutritionists, the potentially enormous caseload, language or cultural barriers and the sheer intractability of patients' eating habits, exercise behaviour and their clinical condition, all conspire to make general practitioners, other team members and often the patients themselves lose heart and stop even trying. However, there are ways of overcoming these difficulties. Examples of changes that evidence suggests are able to support and enhance basic one-to-one interventions in general practice include: improved clinical guidelines; better training of primary care staff; at-risk patient registers; smarter database search tools; new quality incentives; closer working with dietitians, counsellors and pharmacists; more hospital outreach clinics; designated general practitioner specialists and practice clustering; expanded exercise referral schemes and links with leisure providers; subsidised referral to commercial slimming groups; better use of patient groups and voluntary and community workers. The present paper describes a proposed ‘triple-tier’ pathway for weight management incorporating most of the elements mentioned earlier. With a more joined-up and creative approach to the development and organisation of primary care, more comprehensive training and workforce planning, and better integration with social care, voluntary groups and the commercial sector, weight management in general practice has the potential to be much more effective.